Putin will not budge to the West’s demands

imagesB6CF7IXVIt should come as no surprise to anyone that Russia has formally entered a recession for the first time after 2009; this time, though, the prospects of recovery are bleaker. Russian President Vladimir Putin appears to be worried, while the average Russian is feeling anguished by Deputy Economy Minister Alexei Vedev’s unpleasant announcement that GDP growth for 2015 might be -0.8%, worse still than 2014, which is predicted to close at 0.5%.

Sanctions, the collapse of oil and the depreciation of the ruble have combined to give Russia and Putin the biggest blow since the start of the Ukrainian pro-Western European, ‘Euromaidan’ revolt in December 2013. Putin has retaliated, declaring the closure of the South Stream gas pipeline, which had a major European partner in Saipem with his back to the wall. The gas pipeline, could be re-directed to run via Turkey rather than Bulgaria and Poland and it stands as a symbol of the growing diplomatic distance between Moscow and the European Union (EU): the 23.5 billion dollar worth ‘Pipeline of Discord’. A few months ago, the oil giant Rosneft had to give up prospecting in the Arctic with its Texas-based partner Exxon, and now it is Gazprom’s turn to ‘feel the heat’.

The Government’s admission pf recession has come at a very difficult time, when the collapse of the ruble seems unstoppable and consumer prices are growing by the day. The causes of the disaster are obviously attributable mainly to the Western sanctions and Russia’s predictable annexation of the Crimea region. The drop in oil prices, last week, has merely served to highlight Russia’s worsening international relations. For years, Putin had urged experts and oligarchs to diversify the economy; manufacturing and agriculture in particular. The latter was negated and even regressed compared to the Soviet era, forcing Russia to become dependent on imported goods, which now cost much more as Russia relies. Until last summer, a Euro was worth 40 Rubles; yesterday, the currency price shifted to 67 Rubles, a new record low. The government needs top tale some control over worsening the situation even as the spiral of the crisis seems to have just begun.

Yesterday morning Putin had signed a decree suspending pay increases for all public officials. All Russians to have to prepare for tough times. The associations of travel agents, to cite one example, have indicated that the number of Russian tourists abroad next year will be less than half. Meanwhile, the closure of the South Stream pipeline may serve as a way to further alienate the EU. If Putin wants to close the South Stream pipeline, Europe has a lesson to learn, said the Vice-President of the European Commission pointing out that the EU imports acco8nt for more than 30% of its gas needs from Russia.  The South Stream project was supposed to bring Russian gas to Europe through a pipeline under the Black Sea that would arrive in Bulgaria and then in the Balkans, bypassing Ukraine. Yet, Putin’s government shows no signs of gasping, nor has it indicated any halting of its ongoing involvement in neighboring Ukraine, largely because such policies have proven wildly popular with the Russian public. Until that changes, the Russian government will likely maintain its course despite growing economic pressures. Nevertheless, the rhetoric of not bowing to foreign pressure contrasts with requests for negotiations to end the conflict, which means that at some level Putin is worried.

Putin remains popular with Russians, receiving approval ratings of 85% last week (it was 88% last September). Russia has appealed to the Western powers to abandon the sanctions policy in the interests of the world economy – requests that have resonated with many European citizens and officials, who worry that more sanctions would only add to their economic woes. That said, Putin will not budge because to abide by the Western demands is implausible in Putin’s personal leadership ‘vocabulary’. The 80% plus approval ratings are a reflection of his ‘defiance’ against those who have ‘ganged up’ against Russia. Only if he were he to give up the nationalist principles that have guided his actions vis-à-vis Ukraine, would he then incur the people’s wrath. To ensure popularity remains high, Putin will likely continue to shore up support for Ukrainian rebels rather than abandon his ambitions.

While Russia is vulnerable, Putin will encourage Russian businesses to diversify, resume industrialization while continuing to develop its resource sector even as it invests in replacing imports from the West with local goods. Shifting the import focus away from Europe to China; in doing so, however, Russia must avoid the temptation to base that relationship on the familiar pattern of ‘oil and gas in exchange for finished products’ that has been a signature of the recent past. Moreover, Putin will challenge the rentier capitalists that have dubiously earned billions of dollars in the past two decades. The so-called, ‘oligarchs’, will be targeted such that their assets, privatized at ridiculously low prices in the roaring 1990’s of the Boris Yeltsin era, will be re-nationalized. This will include banks, the foreign trade and strategic industries. In the anti-Russia rhetoric that has characterized the coverage of the former ‘superpower’, the media and western leaders have often failed to recognized that after the humiliation of the immediate post-Soviet era, Putin has raised Russia from the abyss and has instilled in Russians dignity and self-worth, which is why he is so popular and why the ‘oligarchs’ seen as pariahs.  President Putin has the support of the vast majority of the Russian people; has allies in China and among the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and has the will and the power to “do the right thing. It remains to be seen if he can fulfill this historic challenge. Of course, in its campaign to consider their responsibilities towards the country, the Kremlin will have aroused the oligarchs’ anger, generating what is, for the time being, an unspoken fear of a coup sponsored by the new wealthy elites.

President Putin has urged his government to adopt new legislation to prevent the use of offshore tax havens making Russian citizens subject to taxes at home no matter where they come from their income. The measures are targeted towards the very wealthy Russians, who systematically try to move their goods and families abroad, fueling capital flight, one of the problems that Putin is no longer willing to tolerate especially when, for both factors cyclical and structural, the Russian economy started to slow down for the first time since he became president 14 years ago. Estimates suggest that capital flight from Russia reached over USD$ 100 billion pounds. It is indeed a measure that meets the favor of the most popular classes, as well as the middle class Russians whose welfare unlike the oligarchs is the fruit of labor and the economic growth of the past few years.




Signs of US recovery while Ukrainian crisis puts pressure on Europe’s economy

russiaThe financial crisis of 2008 led to a ‘Great Recession’ and a sovereign debt crisis in Europe, the consequences of which continue to be felt thanks, also, to the geopolitical fallout from Ukraine, Gaza and the Middle East – not to mention the tensions in East Asia between China and most of its neighbors. The West and NATO are pondering the adoption of tougher sanctions against Russia amid plans to run intensive military exercises that have clearly been announced with President Putin in mind. Most EU countries would rather avoid enforcing sanctions against Russia, which supplies much of the Union’s energy along with several billion dollars of capital to its banks while serving as a key market for western luxury, agriculture and technology goods. As the summer of 2014 comes to a close, the European economy has yet to find respite while the United States, China and Japan have shown signs of health. Tensions abound and they come from all directions, generating a fog that makes it difficult to understand exactly what role the various individual factors, whether structural, political, economic, financial or military are having on the much awaited and often prematurely announced recovery.

The American economy improved in the second quarter, with GDP rising up 4.2% according to the Department of Commerce. The growth contrasts with the slowdown in the first quarter when the economy had contracted by 2.1%. The growth rate in the second quarter may temporarily lift fears of a slowdown or a recession in the American economy after the slowdown of the first quarter, which was such that the average growth rate for the first half of the year is actually lackluster at 1.05%. The confidence of European, and other, observers cannot be very high, considering look that the United States is still the biggest economy in the world and – despite the fact that China is catching up quickly – still the beacon that sets the direction of the international cycle. The USA is still the largest market in the world, absorbing exports from all over the world. There is also a psychological factor such that the world looks to ‘America’ for hope or perhaps at least some comfort that ‘things will improve’. Indeed, this faith in America is not all misplaced.

The United States was surely hit by a hard recession sparked by debt and unscrupulous banking practices. The solution was to cut debt by promoting more savings, leading to lower consumption, which had the effect of slowing down the economy, given that the ‘austerity’ measures were practiced on a wide scale. Now, economists have suggested that American household budgets have improved and that their debt levels are more manageable even as housing values are recovering. In other words all the elements exist to warrant a healthy growth rate fueled by increased consumption and confidence. If the growth rate average for 2014 fails to inspire, despite some bursts of enthusiasm such as has occurred for the second quarter, it is because the improvements so far have mainly been registered at the individual family level. The extent of the 2008 crisis was such that it forced the State to intervene more directly in the American economy; public sector spending for the past six years has been unprecedented to compensate for the vastly reduced private sector spending. The public sector’s coffers were stretched to the limit, hampering its continued ability to compensate for the absentee private sector.

Now, there is actual room for optimism. Household accounts, including public accounts in the United States have improved and even the federal deficit stands at 2.9% of gross domestic product while it had been as high as 10.8 percent at the peak of the crisis in 2009. So, the United States continue to be alive, and all the more so because technical progress never left; innovation at all levels of industry continued and even capital at the corporate level flowed much more freely than in many parts of Europe. This is the kind of optimism reflected by the record highs of the NY stock exchange, which have kept commodities low, even managing to absorb the heavy geopolitical risk that was supposed to have driven gold prices to new records. Indeed, China, whose slowdown from an average GDP growth rate of around 10% to one closer to 7% was supposed to have had dire consequences, has failed to materialize into a crisis. China certainly has some risks, but these are far more related to the population’s rising demand for civil liberties, of which the right to a cleaner environment is essential. Then, there is Japan, whose economic situation is similar to that in much of the European Union, the much acclaimed ‘abenomics’ ( a package of fiscal reforms and stimulus measures) reforms launched by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to promote growth have started to choke after an initial sense of success in 2013.

The Tokyo stock exchange has been growing as has GDP but the improvements have come largely as the result of monetary policies favoring inflation (printing more money) and cash stimulus. Structural reform remains an elusive target. Only structural reform can achieve the desired effect of long term growth. Europe continues to loiter in recessionary territory, albeit there is great discrepancy among individual members. The explanation is more geopolitical than economic as any indicators of confidence are waning even in the economic powerhouse of Germany, which stands to lose or gain the most from its proximity to Ukraine. If Germany sneezes, the rest of Europe catches a cold and its economy is suffering the repercussions of tensions even though the actual growth factors remain intact. The policy of military encirclement against Russia, backed by Washington and blindly accepted – if not convincingly absorbed – by European governments, have led to a crisis of trade relations with Moscow, for which Europe’s productive apparatus has paid a great price, especially Germany, which is in turn the EU’s economic locomotive. NATO is planning to increase the effectiveness and visibility of its forces in Eastern Europe in a Cold War like scenario to scare Moscow into reducing its involvement in the Ukrainian civil war.

This does not mean that The United States, Germany and other allies, have plans to increase the number of its troops in the region, which would vastly increase tensions with Moscow. They merely intend to show “unity and readiness” to respond to events in Ukraine. For now, NATO merely wants to make it clear to Moscow that it is ready to send more troops in its bases in Eastern Europe if necessary through a “rapid deployment force”, through the enhancement of existing bases, logistics, supplies and infrastructure. It is doubtful that President Putin will feel any urge to reverse his strategy in Ukraine. However, Britain and six other states have announced they intention to create a multilateral force with at least 10,000 troops to respond to Russia in Ukraine according to the Financial Times. The official announcement is expected to be issued later this week at the NATO summit. The countries currently involved in the force, which will include naval units and ground troops, are Denmark, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Norway and the Netherlands. Meanwhile, the Kremlin continues to deny any involvement, even though rumors abound that Russian speaking separatists in Ukraine are preparing to attack two key areas of Maryupol and Volnovakha in order to open a corridor between Donetsk until the Crimea. Should this be the case, NATO has stacked the deck too high in order to back down from taking more significant punitive actions with Moscow. This will only raise tensions in Europe, putting pressure on growth.