1

Ecclestone: The BRICS, More Hype than Substance?

In a recent Investor.News interview, Tracy Weslosky spoke with Christopher Ecclestone, Principal and mining strategist of Hallgarten & Company. The discussion revolved around the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) summit in Cape Town and the growing perceptions around this alliance.

When Weslosky brought up Ecclestone’s latest thinkpiece, “BRICS: The Company One Keeps,” he pointed out that while the BRICS concept has resurfaced in light of the Cape Town gathering, it’s essential to see it for what it is. As some nations within the alliance surge forward, others, notably Russia, face staggering economic and diplomatic setbacks. South Africa, despite its mineral wealth, struggles with power problems and economic reputation issues.

Interestingly, the comparison of BRICS as a challenger to the G7 was met with skepticism by Ecclestone. He noted that while G7 nations share many similarities, the BRICS are far more diverse, with their interests and economic trajectories hardly aligning. Ecclestone highlights that the very foundation of BRICS was a marketing strategy by Goldman Sachs in the 1990s to promote emerging market shares. As for its modern relevance, he states, “It’s like a stick to beat the West with, but the West isn’t feeling the blows.”

Echoing a segment from his report titled “Goldman’s Brainchild Disowned,” Ecclestone emphasized that the original creators of the BRICS concept have long distanced themselves from it. They view it as outdated. BRICS was never about a genuine, integrated alliance but more a catchy term, a soundbite for investment opportunities. As Ecclestone succinctly put it, trying to revive its significance now is “like a balloon with a hole in it.”

To access the complete interview, click here

Don’t miss other InvestorIntel interviews. Subscribe to the InvestorIntel YouTube channel by clicking here

Disclaimer: This interview, which was produced by InvestorNews Inc. (“InvestorNews”), does not contain, nor does it purport to contain, a summary of all material information concerning the Company, including important disclosure and risk factors associated with the Company, its business and an investment in its securities. InvestorNews offers no representations or warranties that any of the information contained in this interview is accurate or complete.

This interview and any transcriptions or reproductions thereof (collectively, this “presentation”) does not constitute, or form part of, any offer or invitation to sell or issue, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe for or purchase any securities in the Company. The information in this presentation is provided for informational purposes only and may be subject to updating, completion or revision, and except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any information herein. This presentation may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and assumptions of the management of the Company as of the date made. They are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and other factors that could cause actual events/results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties, including those that the Company does not know about now or that it currently deems immaterial, may also adversely affect the Company’s business or any investment therein.

Any projections given are principally intended for use as objectives and are not intended, and should not be taken, as assurances that the projected results will be obtained by the Company. The assumptions used may not prove to be accurate and a potential decline in the Company’s financial condition or results of operations may negatively impact the value of its securities. This presentation should not be considered as the giving of investment advice by the Company or any of its directors, officers, agents, employees or advisors. Each person to whom this presentation is made available must make its own independent assessment of the Company after making such investigations and taking such advice as may be deemed necessary. Prospective investors are urged to review the Company’s profile on SedarPlus.ca and to carry out independent investigations in order to determine their interest in investing in the Company.




Hallgarten Analyzes BRICS Revival, China’s Ambitious Play and the Global Response

BRICS, an acronym representing the collective might of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, was a term birthed by Jim O’Neill of Goldman Sachs in 2001. It showcased the surging economies that were predicted to majorly influence the global economic trajectory by 2050. The coalition has since emerged as a significant player in global geopolitics, sometimes seen as a counter to the G7 bloc of advanced economies. This evolution is evident through initiatives such as the BRICS New Development Bank, the BRICS payment system, and their ambitious plans for a BRICS reserve currency.

Christopher Ecclestone’s thinkpiece from Hallgarten & Company delves deep into this recent revitalization of BRICS, led predominantly by China. A few key insights from his analysis (click here to access):

  1. Historical Context: The original concept of BRIC, conceived by Goldman Sachs, did not include South Africa. Its addition converted the group’s acronym from BRIC to BRICS. Despite the collective’s ambitious prospects, the inclusion of certain nations, like South Africa, raised questions about the true power and potential of the union.
  2. China’s Play: Ecclestone argues that China’s effort to rejuvenate BRICS appears to be a strategic move to establish a clique under its dominance. The summit, however, had its peculiarities he suggests, with China’s President Xi sending a minor minister to deliver his speech, drawing parallels to Jay Gatsby’s famous absence from his own party.
  3. BRICS vs. Dollar Dominance: While BRICS hints at challenging the global dominance of the US dollar, Ecclestone remains skeptical. He believes the diverse nature of BRICS members could hinder their ambitious objective more than any economic rationale.
  4. Argentina’s Hesitation: Recent attempts to extend invitations to countries like Argentina brought into focus the internal politics and historical grievances. South Africa’s invitation to Argentina, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and others sparked discussions about international relations and political dynamics. Argentina, for example, showed reluctance, with its leadership expressing reservations about BRICS, further highlighting the bloc’s controversial nature.
  5. Serbia and Bosnia’s Pivot: Drawing from the Intellinews story, we observe a shift in European geopolitics. Serbian intelligence chief, Aleksandar Vulin, and Milorad Dodik, president of Republika Srpska in Bosnia & Herzegovina, have advocated for their countries to join BRICS instead of seeking EU membership. This, coupled with a recent poll indicating a Serbian inclination towards BRICS, showcases a significant geopolitical swing influenced by the BRICS expansion.

Conclusion

China’s aggressive push to revive and expand BRICS has significant global implications. However, the journey is not without its challenges. Skeptics like Ecclestone question the bloc’s true potential and influence. While some nations are drawn to the allure of the BRICS coalition, others remain hesitant due to geopolitical complexities.

This transformation of BRICS from an economic association to a more politically charged coalition signifies a broader shift in global power dynamics. As nations reevaluate their alliances, the international community will keenly observe BRICS’s next moves and their broader implications.