EDITOR: | December 8th, 2017 | 5 Comments

Stars “may be aligning” for the long-awaited uranium market recovery

| December 08, 2017 | 5 Comments

Over the past 6 years, the words “up” and “uranium” have seldom been used in the same sentence.  It’s been a long, hard slog for uranium miners. However, global events are currently occurring that may possibly signal the long-awaited fundamental shift. Indeed, announcements from Kazatomprom and Cameco over the past month signal the elimination of approximately 24 million pounds of uranium from the global market in 2018 alone.

As an experienced member of our industry, I have believed for some time that history is in the process of repeating itself. Uranium markets simply cannot be sustained when the price of uranium is below the cost of production – like it is today. We’ve seen this movie before. Expected uranium demand increases, resulting in uranium price increases. Production also increases – but with a lag. However, you don’t license, finance, and build new uranium mines overnight. Because there is a lag in new, needed production, uranium prices can spike to unsustainable levels, as was the case in 2007 when the spot price hit $137 per pound. Due to these high prices, miners, investors, and even governments like Kazakhstan sense opportunity and bring on substantially greater levels of production. As is often the case, the industry brings on too much production, especially when uranium demand fails to meet expectations. This is exactly what happened subsequent to the Fukushima accident in March 2011. As a result of all this new uranium production coming online – much of it excess – prices predictably decrease. Like clockwork, production decreases as well – but again, with a lag. It’s hard for miners to halt production after expending so much time and capital on their projects. But, also uranium production is often supported by long-term contracts signed during high-price market environments when utilities get nervous about supply and uranium appears scarce. These contracts have deliveries over a number of years at prices that prevailed at the time the contract was signed. After these contracts expire, the miners shut their mines down – which is exactly what the industry is currently experiencing. Wash. Rinse. History repeats.

2017 has seen three major uranium production cuts announced. In January 2017, Kazakhstan announced a 10% production cut for 2017 equating to about 5 million lbs. On that news alone, the spot price of uranium rose from about $18 per pound in November 2016 to over $26 per pound in February 2017. Then, on November 8, 2017, Cameco announced it would be suspending production at McArthur River for 10 months starting in February 2018. This is the world’s largest uranium mine, accounting for roughly 10% of the World’s uranium mine production. If Cameco restarts operations at McArthur River after 10 months (a big “if”) about 15 million pounds of uranium will have been lost to the market. On this news, the spot price rose from about $20 per pound to about $26 per pound. According to TradeTech, it dropped back to about $22.50 on November 27, likely due to some month-end trading activity. But, it snapped right back up to over $24 on November 28, likely based on these new market fundamentals.

And, then on December 4, 2017, Kazatomprom (Kazakhstan’s state-owned uranium production company) announced that it was cutting 2018 – 2020 production by a further 20%, including over 10 million pounds of uranium in 2018 and nearly 20 million more pounds in total for 2019 and 2020. We have yet to see how this news ripples through the spot market, but on Dec. 4, we saw the spot price close at $26.50 per pound. The Kazatomprom news also potentially ‘multiplies’ the Cameco news, in that it removes any worry that Kazakhstan might increase production on the back of the Cameco news to increase market share.

We’ve also seen Areva announce some cuts at their mines in Niger. China’s Husab mine in Namibia isn’t meeting its early, lofty expectations. We’ve also heard rumors about the potential for further production cuts elsewhere. Production cuts should ultimately generate a price recovery. If the recently announced cuts don’t do the trick, there is a very real chance that Cameco may keep McArthur River shut down and/or other production cuts will likely be announced. It seems almost inevitable – amidst today’s inexorably rising uranium demand – the cycle described above will begin anew and uranium prices should recover.

I also believe that the Kazakh, Cameco and other production cuts will have a major impact on the spot, mid-term, and long-term uranium market dynamics and their relative importance to utilities, traders, and producers. Producers like Cameco and Energy Fuels need utilities to return to the long-term market to sustain a market recovery and incentivize needed production. However, even though the spot market only accounts for a small proportion of the broader uranium and nuclear fuel markets, it has an outsized influence. Everyone follows the daily, weekly and monthly spot market prices. Stocks rise and fall on spot market activity. Uranium changes hands, not on the spot market itself, but under contracts with pricing determined by reported spot prices. Term contracts often have a spot price component. Given how small and relatively thin the spot market actually is, it exerts a disproportionate amount of influence.

During the November 9, 2017 conference call discussing the McArthur River shutdown, Cameco’s Senior Vice President and CFO, Grant Isaac, made a telling statement about the spot market: “Our experience is it [the spot market] isn’t a very deep market, so I’m not sure it’s going to take much activity to get some excitement going.” In addition, both Mr. Isaac and President and CEO, Tim Gitzel, stated that Cameco may buy uranium on the spot market to feed into their contract portfolio, to the extent material is available and that it costs less than their all-in, sustaining cost of production. In other words, Cameco is likely to become a buyer of spot uranium, rather than a seller. And, considerable quantities of Kazakh uranium trade on the spot market, meaning there will be that much less material available.

Adding fuel to the fire, utilities have entered into mid-term, “carry-trade” contracts with traders and intermediaries over the past several years to meet a large proportion of their uranium needs. These are contracts for deliveries within 1-4 years’ time, with pricing related to the then-prevailing spot price at the time of contract execution plus a minimal financing component. Some traders buy the uranium they are required to deliver into the contract on the spot market at the time of entering into the contract. However, other traders do not cover their positions until later. With Cameco potentially competing on the spot market, and less Kazakh material available, there is very likely to be less spot uranium available. Following on to Mr. Isaac’s comment above, we might be about to find out just how “deep” – or “shallow” – the uranium spot market is. If it’s as shallow as many of us think it is, the spot market could be in for a wild ride.

Finally, because there may be greater competition for what might be a limited supply of spot uranium, it’s safe to assume there will likely be less uranium available for spot- and mid-term deals that have displaced long-term contracts over the past several years. And, even though inventories of uranium held by nuclear utilities have risen over the past few years, they could become very nervous about all of this reduction in supply. In other words, in addition to the strong potential for upward movement and volatility in spot prices, we might finally see a revival in long-term uranium contracting, where utilities buy uranium from producers like Energy Fuels at pricing that is driven, not by the vagaries of the spot- and mid-term markets, but by – gasp – supply, demand, and what it costs to actually produce a pound of uranium.

These proactive moves by Kazatomprom and Cameco should benefit proven producers. The U.S. is the World’s largest consumer of uranium, and while no one can see the future, the “stars may be aligning” for the long-awaited uranium market recovery. 2018 could be an interesting year for the global uranium industry.

Birks Bovaird


For a majority of his career, Mr. J. Birks Bovaird’s focus has been the provision and implementation of corporate financial consulting and strategic planning services. ... <Read more about Birks Bovaird>

Copyright © 2020 InvestorIntel Corp. All rights reserved. More & Disclaimer »


  • Tracy Weslosky

    Thank you for a hard carved piece of text on the uranium market. Been bullish on this sector for at least 3 years, the turn around is inevitable….we need more education on the positive benefits of nuclear energy! As we all know — nuclear power generation emits relatively low amounts of carbon dioxide…

    December 8, 2017 - 3:02 PM

  • jacsar

    However no mention of ASX ..BKY , soon to be producer in Spain of approx 4 million pound production p/y forward sold at an extremely healthy margin

    December 9, 2017 - 11:19 AM

    • Tracy Weslosky

      will check it out!

      December 14, 2017 - 4:19 PM

  • John Thornton

    BKY – offtake at US $43.78 per lb U3O8 -hardly anything to get excited about.

    According to some that wouldn’t even cover the “all up” cost of exploration (over many years) and recovery/mining. Sure it looks good in a market where U3O8 sells for around $20 lb spot and around $30 long term contract price, but if you can’t even replace your deposit at the price you are selling the U3O8 – what’s the point.

    They would have been better off waiting imo, than giving it away like they have.

    Unhedged explorers will have far greater upside imo – just wait and see what happens when the uranium Spot Price cracks US$100 lb

    There is no boom like a uranium boom !

    December 10, 2017 - 3:11 PM

  • Jim smith

    Today there are many huge mines on care and maintenance. Not shut down but ready to flood the market when prices recover even a little. It costs a lot of money to have a mine on care and maintenence and miners would rather be producing even at breakeven. The space has changed from 12 years ago. New uranium boom has been pumped now for 6 years. Its all smoke and mirrors and may never happen.

    November 14, 2019 - 8:38 AM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *