EDITOR: | February 13th, 2018 | 5 Comments

The game changing automotive world of solid state batteries

| February 13, 2018 | 5 Comments

Solid state batteries are regarded by many as a game changer. Toyota has promised to have solid state lithium cells in cars by 2020, and Dyson bought solid state battery developer Sakti3 in 2015 after it announced that it was close to a battery with twice the density of current models at a fifth of the cost, while being non-flammable, longer lasting and quicker to charge. Both companies are looking to launch these products in around two years, and while development has some way to go, it’s looking pretty certain that, at least at some point, solid state lithium cells will be commercially viable.

Within the resulting development space, Nano One Materials Corp. (TSXV: NNO) (“Nano One”) is working with a tier 1 automotive supplier to advance the solid state dream. Nano One proposes a cobalt-free high-voltage spinel (HVS) and nickel-rich NMC cathode manufactured using its own superior technology. HVS differs from other cathodes because it is made from lithium, manganese and nickel, without the high cost and supply chain risk of cobalt. The project has so far led to two patent applications and HVS production is ready for pilot scale demonstration.

Additionally, operating the recently constructed pilot plant has enabled the company to complete preliminary engineering plans for a modular 3,300 tonne per year cathode production unit that could supply materials for around 24,000 electric vehicle batteries. Nano One has also begun work on detailed plant engineering in support of technology licensing proposals to global industrial interests, and coatings and additives are being developed to enhance durability, stability and compatibility with solid electrolytes. The flexible nature of the company’s nano-engineering technology means it is able to respond to new market demands such as this far more quickly than others.

Nano One looks likely to be taken up into the supply chain simply because its technology cuts costs by up to 50% while delivering more robust cathode materials. The benefits for the electric vehicle and consumer electronics markets are too great to ignore (fewer battery cells, less weight, less cost extended range, longer lifetime or better warranties, greater storage, faster charging, more power etc.). Even the more promising cathode materials in development require processes with up to 100 steps spanning 4-7 days, but Nano One’s process can take less than a day with up to 75% fewer steps, and crucially, does not depend on costly lithium hydroxide.

The company can make HVS and other high performance cathodes using lithium carbonate or hydroxide, giving its process an advantage over manufacturing methods constrained to lithium hydroxide. As a result of the currently expected high growth in the battery sector, the price of lithium hydroxide has increased far in excess of its carbonated counterpart; it’s this sort of reactivity that makes Nano One such a robust investment option. The company is resistant to almost all of the market changes that make everyone else so vulnerable. Cobalt bad? No problem. Lithium too expensive? Fine. Manganese shortage? Whatevs.

The market has shown serious confidence in Nano One this year, with share prices making an almighty leap throughout January, although they’ve been on the up since the beginning of 2016. But whichever direction technology markets may take us over the next few decades, we expect that Nano One will be heavily involved, and these are very much early days.


Copyright © 2019 InvestorIntel Corp. All rights reserved. More & Disclaimer »


  • Chu Menudo

    What does the author think the “C” in NMC represents? Nickel rich NMC has about 20% cobalt.

    February 13, 2018 - 8:42 PM

    • Alexander Loeppke

      Thats not the point ! Lara Smiths reference to cobalt is aiming at pointing out HVS advantages . Poor Shot friend Do your Research

      February 16, 2018 - 12:35 PM

  • Lara Smith

    Hi Chu- thank you for your comment, though you are asking this of an analyst who has followed the metal for over a decade and loves cobalt chemistry so much that she named my dog- Cobalt 7 years ago 😀

    Yes we all know NMC chemistry has cobalt in it!

    What you need to take from this article is the following:
    1) Normally the effect of “cobalt doping” i.e. adding cobalt to the spinel is that the cycle times improve. Studies have shown that after 1000 cycles, cobalt doping results in battery still delivering 94% of its capacity.
    2) When you are using a battery for something that’s meant to be longer lasting “an EV” the fact that the battery needs to be able to deliver after a number of cycles is pretty imperative.
    3) Therefore the fact that NNO is working to deliver a cobalt-free HVS spinel and that they are in partnership with an auto supplier is pretty big news given that the entire market is concerned over the potential cobalt deficit as these electric autos gain traction.

    February 14, 2018 - 12:03 AM

  • dr.mike.hirschberger.

    Hi Lara-

    Congrats–you really nailed it with this insightful look at NanoOne…

    IMHO, If solid state battery is to emerge from the murky swamp of new battery configurations, the missing link to success is clearly surface technology of both the anode and cathode. As you so articulately describe, NanoOne is way out in front the crowd in this regard. It is not so much-if solid state offers much safer and orders of magnitude gains in efficacy over the current -oh os 20th Century battery designs, -but will the design gain acceptance and will it scale?? The jury is still out, but the day may well come when II readers look back at your article and rue the day they didn’t jump on NanoOne.

    Of course only time will tell. But, NanoOne is far down the learning curve and from what I hear from my sources-they are also way ahead of the crowd they are selling to (names withheld for the obvious)–I only hope it is not the old adage of ‘casting pearls before swine’.

    regardless, keep up the good work.

    February 14, 2018 - 10:47 AM

  • Intrigued Investor

    Great analysis and really enjoy the commentary, learning a lot … making better informed decisions .. really appreciative of the expertise I find here

    February 15, 2018 - 11:12 AM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *