EDITOR: | August 9th, 2015 | 4 Comments

Resource benefit sharing to address poverty in First Nations – just not enough.

| August 09, 2015 | 4 Comments

First-Nations-ColumnWe need effective mechanisms for sharing the benefits of natural resources to redress the extreme poverty of Canada’s aboriginals.

This is a graffiti I photographed off a doorframe in the Pikangikum First Nation in Northwestern Ontario in 2001. Peering through the window of my hotel room, I saw dopy-eyed ten-year-old kids sniffing gasoline out of grocery bags. It was one of the saddest thing I’ve seen in my life. That year the Pikangikum reserve, a community of 2000, had the highest suicide rate per capita in the western world. MacLean’s magazine reported on the same issue 12 years later. Sadly nothing has changed.

On January 21, 2000 I received the most important social lesson of my life. I’d just completed lecturing about the economic benefit of non-timber forest values to a group of foresters and First Nations to promote resource sharing in Garden River First Nation. After my lecture, an aboriginal Elder came to me. Waiving an arthritic finger in my direction, she said: “Never forget that the poorest people in that country of yours are single women in Indian reserves. They have nothing, no support, no voice. These are the people you need to help.”

Years later, the principal of an on-reserve school in Northern Ontario where I was doing some work told me, teary-eyed, that half his students have extreme behavioral disorders that need medication. If 50% of the children of any settler community showed this trend, the Prime Minister would declare a national emergency. There would be countless public enquiries. We would never hear the end of it.

Nothing is new: Aboriginals in Canada have been treated poorly throughout history.

I am of the opinion that a resource grab was a primary motivation of the cultural genocide inflicted by the Indian Residential School System: while children were assimilated, the governments were quietly plotting to take over the natural resources of traditional hunting grounds for natural resource exploitation. There should be no doubt in anyone’s mind that conspiracy was at play. It was vile and has caused irreparable damages to the aboriginal cultures of Canada.

New solutions show willingness to help but a poor understanding of poverty issues. For example, to secure a license to operate a sawmill in Ontario, the applicant must include the participation of First Nations. This helps somewhat by providing local jobs but it offers no help to single women and school children.

Fundamentally this is not sustainable: While it is axiomatic that corporations exploiting natural resources are sustainable, the communities that support them are not. This applies to aboriginal communities as well as settler communities but it is especially hurtful to aboriginal communities because of the reserve system as per the Indian Act of Canada, which forces aboriginal in reserve land.

Benefit sharing can mean much more than employing laborers to cut trees. The best example I have seen is the 18.9 mW White River power dam, a joint venture between the Pic Mobert First Nation and Regional Power which show a sustainable approach to alleviating First Nation poverty. Clever people, government funding and willingness to think about sustainable communities created this. I was peripherally involved in the deal, a fact that swells my chest with pride.

We have to reverse past trends that started with the arrival of settlers in Canada. For example, I’ve done resources-related field work (forestry and minerals) in all of Canada’s provinces. The one thing I have observed is that First Nations reserves are generally on the poorest track of lands in any one region. I have travelled to enough First Nation reserves to see a pattern: reserve lands are the crappy ones with poor potential for agriculture. There is a historical reason: settlers in search of good farmlands pushed the First Nation people back into the mosquito swamps.

There is a lot of reconciliation to be done between Canada and its aboriginal people. Though the current rhetoric is reconciliatory, the mechanisms for reconciliation and reparation are poorly defined and are at risk to lapse into yet more decades of platitudes.

Benefit sharing is not about year-round moose hunting and pickerel fishing. It’s about creating mechanisms that permit to support the poorest of the poor among us.

Dr. Luc Duchesne


Dr. Luc C. Duchesne is a Speaker and Author with a PhD in Biochemistry. With three decades of scientific and business experience, he has published ... <Read more about Dr. Luc Duchesne>

Copyright © 2019 InvestorIntel Corp. All rights reserved. More & Disclaimer »


  • Tracy Weslosky

    What an absolutely moving and thoughtful commentary Luc, thank you.

    This said, I understand that the recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions in 2014 re the duty to consult and accommodate is having an enormous impact on business. And feedback in my email already included being advised “that there is a new generation of aboriginal leaders who can bridge the divide….” that readers would like us to profile.

    Looking forward to your next column — as always, thank you.

    August 9, 2015 - 5:03 PM

  • David Sharpe

    Thank you Dr. Duchesne for your article. The duty to consult is now real in Canada and companies that shirk their responsibility do so at their own peril. Think of the Ring of Fire in Northern Ontario where companies that did not properly consult with First Nations have been banished forever in an area that contains $80 billion in minerals. In fact, companies who do real, fulsome consultation with First Nations are finding that the First Nation often provides new opportunities in revenue creation.

    As a First Nations person who is the President of one of Canada’s largest private debt funds, I have seen first-hand how the duty to consult has been mutually beneficial for First Nations and corporate Canada. Our company alone has closed 4 deals with First Nations in the last 6 weeks. We have more First Nation deals to come and also a deal with a 100 percent Inuit-owned company. These deals are great for our company and also is providing infrastructure funds for remote First Nations – a win-win for all.

    David Sharpe
    President, Bridging Finance Inc.
    Chair, First Nations University of Canada

    August 9, 2015 - 5:41 PM

  • Tim Ainsworth

    Dr. Duchesne, could I ask for a few bullet points around the success of the White River power dam in your opinion?
    Does it present some form of template?

    August 9, 2015 - 6:29 PM

  • Reiner Mielke

    Interesting view but a distortion of reality. “There is a historical reason: settlers in search of good farmlands pushed the First Nation people back into the mosquito swamps.” The 6 Nations were not pushed into any swamp and the Cree who have never farmed call the swamps their home and have no intention of leaving their swamps. “We’ve been living on that land for thousands of years,” Achneepineskum says. “And we are going to continue to live there for another hundred of thousands of years.”

    August 11, 2015 - 1:13 PM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *