EDITOR: | October 7th, 2013 | 10 Comments

Homeland Security, Wikileaks, Jack Bauer — and Mason Graphite

| October 07, 2013 | 10 Comments

24wallpaper12The following piece depicts events that took place from 2009 to the present.

In the torrent of U.S. Government diplomatic cables spilled out by Wikileaks beginning in early 2010 – ultimately 251,000 in all — one little-noticed document should be book-marked by all resource wonks: a cable sent by the U.S. State Department, providing a fleeting inside-look at something called the “Critical Foreign Dependencies Initiative.”

As the cable notes:

“In the USA Patriot Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195(e)) ‘critical infrastructure’ is defined as systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, so vital to the United States the incapacitation or destruction of such systems and assets would have a debilitating impact on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination of those matters.”

While the senders at State designated the cable “SECRET/NOFORN” (no foreign nationals) and marked it for de-classification in 2019, Wikileaks declassified it a little bit ahead of schedule, revealing an intriguing list of “Critical Infrastructure/Key Resources” outside of the U.S. “which, if destroyed, disrupted or exploited, would likely have an immediate and deleterious effect on the United States.”

On the list of Key Resources: Graphite mines — in Canada and China.

The leaked cable is silent on how the U.S. Government might go about securing these “critical sites” (will Jack Bauer parachute in in the event of a crisis? There are some things even Julian Assange doesn’t know). As for China, it must be comforting for Beijing’s leadership to know that they have a graphite mine – and, scanning the list, much else besides – that the U.S. Homeland Security apparatus believes to be critical to U.S. “security, national economic security, national public health or safety.”

There must be something about graphite’s properties of superior conductivity and extreme heat-resistance that makes it key not only to the U.S. economy – but national security as well (think moderator rods and reflector components in nuclear reactors, and Radar Absorbent Material in stealth aircraft, to name just two). Now, the Critical Foreign Dependency list is just that – a list, lacking any detail or rationale. But if there’s some mystery about U.S. Homeland Security putting Canadian and Chinese mines on the list, there’s no doubt why there are no American graphite mines. There aren’t any.

Since the list leaked, things have gotten worse. The Canadian mine referenced in the once-secret cable — Timcal’s Lac des Iles property 250 km northwest of Montreal — stopped operations several months ago.

That leaves China’s graphite operations, already providing 70% of the world’s graphite and 75% of the graphite used to make steel. That’s a strong position from which to leverage commercial markets – and it’s equally useful should China’s leadership decide to use its graphite leverage for geo-political ends. All of which puts the U.S. dangerously close to the land of SPOF – in defense-speak, “Single Point of Failure:” A deficiency that renders an entire system – whether weapons or economic – unable to function. Were it not for Wikileaks, the public would be none the wiser about these dangerous dependencies.

That’s the national security context that makes last week’s announcement by Canada’s Mason Graphite — which in independent tests achieved 99% purity, without optimization, for its 100% flake graphite — noteworthy beyond its considerable commercial implications.

Mason’s resource averages over 20% carbon-as-graphite content – more than double the percentage of any other graphite mine operating today. As Ty Dinwoodie reported last week to InvestorIntel readers, “as a result, [Mason’s Lac Gueret project] is poised to be one of the lowest-cost flake graphite producers in the world.” Which means it’s time for the U.S. State Department to update its Critical Foreign Dependencies cable, or perhaps they already have. Only they – and Julian Assange – know for sure.

The lesson here: A stable supply of graphite is important, and increasingly so. The commercial case for high-quality large flake graphite like that found at Lac Gueret will help meet growing demand, driven by lithium-ion batteries – requiring 10 times as much graphite as lithium – and, in the decades ahead, traditional refractory uses to meet rising steel demand spurred by the middle-class expectations of 3 billion newly-minted consumers in China, India and elsewhere in Asia.

So yes, when it comes to graphite, markets are watching, manufacturers are watching – and governments are watching, too, even if they wished we didn’t know it.

That’s life as a critical commodity. Congratulations: You’re on the list. The world’s Big Brothers have their eyes on you. As for Mason Graphite, as they move their project forward, they may want to keep an eye out for Jack Bauer. The good news is, Kiefer Sutherland’s already got his Canadian passport. There’s going to be a lot of interest in near-pure graphite flake.



InvestorIntel is a trusted source of reliable information at the forefront of emerging markets that brings investment opportunities to discerning investors.

Copyright © 2020 InvestorIntel Corp. All rights reserved. More & Disclaimer »


  • Goldman

    Thanks for the article. Its worth highlighting how critical graphite is these days, specially for the US

    However, I dont see why the author focused only in Mason. There are some other graphite projects more advanced in Canada. Also, there is Graphite One, a potential huge deposit (without uranium) in Alaska. Given the US interest in securing graphite supply, developing a mine in US soil could be a strategic target for the country…


    October 7, 2013 - 11:32 AM

  • Dr. Copper

    Thats correct, Mason is ex. Timcal folks and Timcal being a producer
    of both natural graphite powders as well as Synthetic powders which
    require the graphifitication optimisation process. Natural graphite of
    high purity will save that step and money.

    Both powders is produced from 10 to 25 microns grades with
    morphology showing in all flaky shapes.

    October 7, 2013 - 3:36 PM

  • Tom

    Shouldn’t Lomiko get a little love in all of this?

    October 7, 2013 - 7:35 PM

  • Simon Moores

    A great article. Good work Dan.

    Its interesting to note that of all the 100 plus exploration projects that have been established in the last 3 years, only a handful are in the US (Graphite One (Alaska), Alabama Graphite (Alabama) of note) and they are run by Canadian companies.

    There seems to be a lack of support for the exploration sector of niche and critical minerals in the US. I think this is a problem unless the US can rely on Canada 100% which it probably can. But then its not true resource independence.

    October 9, 2013 - 7:11 AM

  • Daniel McGroarty

    Thanks, as always, for the thoughtful comments. Regarding Lomiko, I threw a little love its way in my Unobtainium/graphene piece last week — along with Grafoid, too.

    Simon Moores — Mr. Graphite, as I see it — points out that the space has seen more than 100 projects ramp up in the past three years. In looking at Mason Graphite, my reasons boil down to 20-20 and 2015: 20-20 as in more than 20% carbon-as-graphite (Cg) content, with a 20+ year minelife. And 2015, as in commencing production in the last part of 2015 — just about 2 years from now.

    As for Simon’s comments on U.S. strategic metals policy, I’m touched by his diplomacy. Yes, two key U.S. graphite projects are Canadian ventures — which goes to Canada’s acuity in the strategic metals space, and their gumption in terms of taking on the U.S. permitting process. It’s also true that the U.S. could largely rely on a Canadian graphite supplier — the least dangerous geo-political dependency — but no, as Simon notes, that’s not true “resource independence,” which in a time of conflict might be all that counts.

    October 9, 2013 - 9:03 AM

    • Ty Dinwoodie

      Great article, Dan.

      October 9, 2013 - 9:42 AM

    • Dr. Copper

      Great views, I think its more a question of resource nationalization, I know, a subject so often discussed,
      but the critical minersls list is very real and getting
      huge focus by governments, not only the Chinese.

      There is nothing more important than securing a stable supply, and then you can let the analysts scream and shout, and try influence commodity prices by verbal negativity, it wont matter one day.

      There is quite alot of spare capacity in the western and Asian economies that with the growth in spendable income and population, the coming expansion will be
      much stronger than the previous upto 2009. More so
      for the critical minerals.

      I trust you all are familiar that the traded volumes has
      increased close to 5 pct annually since the GFC in 2009.

      Its no coincidence the world still ticking even better
      than in 2009.

      October 9, 2013 - 11:31 AM

  • InvestorIntel’s Week-in-Review: Orbite Aluminae (+27.71%), Pele Mountain (+27.91%), Lomiko Metals (+9.09%), & Allana Potash (+6.82%) | InvestorIntel

    […] Yours truly also interviewed Mason Gaphite Inc. (TSXV: LLG) President and CEO Benoît Gascon and discussed how Mason acquired one of the world’s highest-grade graphite deposits. Daniel McGroarty wrote a great article that referenced Mason in: Homeland Security, Wikileaks, Jack Bauer – and Mason Graphite. […]

    October 16, 2013 - 8:25 AM

  • More please: The critical contributions of Rare Earth Elements to the ‘new’ economy | InvestorIntel

    […] the world. This issue is just too important. According to my esteemed colleague and industry expert Dan McGroarty, expedite permitting and create national and international REE stockpiles to ensure a long-term […]

    October 16, 2013 - 6:54 PM

  • Descubra 22 coisas que você aprendeu errado | WikiBlog

    […] Fonte da imagem: Reprodução/InvestorIntel […]

    September 1, 2014 - 3:15 PM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *