EDITOR: | March 24th, 2015 | 7 Comments

Clausi follow-ups on Rumours, News and Guesses

| March 24, 2015 | 7 Comments
image_pdfimage_print

It’s easy to toss an opinion out into the digital airwaves. It’s harder to track them back and see what’s happened since. So here we go, following up on some of my articles published here at InvestorIntel over the past few months:

Pretium Resources. The rumour was that this developer of the massive Brucejack project in north British Columbia was hunting targets in South America. I said at the time it was unlikely but possible. I checked with the Pretium people during PDAC in March. This rumour has as much chance of being true as I have of winding up on a Victoria’s Secret runway.

Anaconda Mining Inc. In mid-February I wrote that this Newfoundland gold producer would have to get bigger regionally before it could expect any real respect in the markets. Anaconda later announced that during Q3 of 2015, it sold 4,508 ounces of gold (a new quarterly record), roughly 59 per cent higher than Q3 2014. Revenue for the quarter was $6,266,754 at an average sales price of $1,390 per ounce.

The better news, from a long term investor viewpoint, is that Anaconda is getting more aggressive. It announced a goal to double the Point Rousse Project annual production of gold from 15,000 ounces to 30,000 ounces, by feeding bulk tonnage from pits like Stog’er Tight and by blending ore from high-grade veins like Deer Cove with Pine Cove pit feed.

It also is conducting exploration work on properties in the area.

You should measure management by the success they have in executing on this good plan.

Medical Marijuana. A longer article updating this topic is coming. Right now, we’re all waiting for the outcome of the Allard decision in the Federal Court of Appeal, which won’t be out until next fall or so. My guess is the new MMPR laws will be found constitutional but their implementation will be delayed by court order until the MMAR (patients under the current system of “grow-your-own”) are able to transition over. In concept it will be similar to how the Supreme Court dealt with Canada’s prostitution laws, giving both sides a leg-up.

If the decision turns out this way, many of the new MMPR licence holders will find themselves without a target market, with minimal revenue, without a viable business plan, and therefore without a future. Expect much short term pain, opening the market for consolidation and long-term gain. Remember the dot com crash in 2000, and how the good tech companies not only recovered but thrived.

We’re also quite interested in the Supreme Court of Canada hearing Smith.

At issue is Owen Smith, from Victoria, B.C., caught baking snacks with marijuana for members of a local compassion club. While some of those members were legally authorized to smoke medical marijuana, Mr. Smith gave it to them in baked form, which is illegal. Whether you think the law is goofy isn’t the point: what’s in play in law is the constitutional aspect of health care. Regardless of which side wins, the decision will have far-reaching consequences not only for medical marijuana users but for everyone accessing health care in Canada.

And if we’re talking about MM, let’s quickly chat about Hemp. Quoting myself from this past summer:

Nine states have now passed bills allowing for hemp production. Eight more have passed bills calling for its study. Hemp is booming.

As a retail product in the USA, over half a billion dollars of hemp products were sold at the retail level alone in 2012, and this at a time when the growing of hemp was still unlawful! One can only imagine the explosive growth when farmers across the country begin harvesting hemp. And as social attitudes and legislation governing cannabis become more permissive, it is not unreasonable to expect the restrictions on growing hemp to ease off as well.

That’s happening now. State after state is permitting hemp, the THC-free cousin to marijuana. Expect much more news from the industrial hemp world.

Alabama Graphite. AG recently announced it had found naturally occurring graphene on its Coosa graphite property in Alabama. That announcement was poorly handled by management which probably muted the market response, but even so the shares popped from around 20 cents to the low 30’s on high volume, before settling to around 22 as of today.

The news, though, is staggering in its implications. If a cheap natural source of graphene can be found and easily processed, the applications are almost endless. I’m a bit surprised there has been no follow-up news from the company to take advantage of the market paying attention.

My guess is management is working through issues with IIROC and the regulators as to the mishandling of the press release, and is working through a long list of non-disclosure agreements with scientific bodies around the world. Keep an eye on AG for the science. As with every evolving company, there will have to be changes to the board and management team to adapt to the next phase of the company’s success.

Arcan Resources. Management failed the security holders on this one. The debentures have been converted to common shares, at a significant haircut. There are now about a hundred gradzillion shares now outstanding, making it impossible to calculate real value. The private equity investment house that backed the deal (Stornoway Portfolio Management and Scott Reid) has appointed two new directors to the board. Time will tell if the team can work its way out of this mess.

Iron Ore: Lonely is the commodity without love. The Northern Miner’s editorial on page 4 of the March 16 – 22 edition spells it out extremely well. Having a Cost of Production almost equal to Revenue, prior to G&A, is not a sustainable business model. Iron ore is trading below USD$60 per tonne, and very few companies can make money at these levels. Those wheezing sounds you hear are the iron ore companies gasping for breath. The Australian producers should survive, but it’s a just a roll of the dice as to who else will be around in two years. High risk, low return … not an ideal investment.

And this is when you can expect sovereign funds to poach great assets from other countries. China still might be in the hunt for iron ore.

Integra Gold. We talked about this near-term producer in Val D’Or, Quebec prior to the release of its latest PEA on the Lamaque gold project. The stock was trading around 20 cents. It was an easy call that the PEA would have a substantial impact on the company’s perceived value. It’s now trading fairly solidly in the low 30’s – that PEA showed that value had been created by the drill bit and by the boardroom table.

The company has since released initial drill results from its 2015 Triangle drill program, and final results from condemnation drilling over the proposed ramp at the Parallel zone on Lamaque South. The results are good (see the March 24 /15 press release).

Integra continues to work eight drill rigs on Lamaque, targetting 50,000 metres of drilling in 2015. This means a steady flow of mostly-positive news out of Integra over the rest of 2015.

Don’t be surprised if a larger intermediate company takes a run at Integra over that period.

Athabasca Basin. Continues to be in play. Twenty per cent of the world’s uranium comes out of the Basin, and the corporate machinations will take place regardless of the price of uranium.

Watch for bloodshed as corporate and personal scores get settled in north Saskatchewan. Some of the juniors up that way, with weak assets and poor corporate governance and no ability to raise capital, don’t deserve to survive. There will be a consolidation play in the area, with one or two of the resulting players then being perfectly set up for takeout at a premium, so make sure your helmet is buckled and your mouthguard is in. Lawyers, proxy advisory firms and investment bankers could make their year-end bonus off the expected activity in the Basin. Points North Landing could become the next Fort McMurray.


Peter Clausi

Editor:

Mr. Clausi is an experienced investment banker, executive and director. A graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School called to Ontario's bar in 1990, Mr. Clausi ... <Read more about Peter Clausi>


Copyright © 2017 InvestorIntel Corp. All rights reserved. More & Disclaimer »


Comments

  • hackenzac

    Peter; What does it mean to you that Alabama Graphite found “naturally occurring graphene”? What do you think they were trying to say? I have imagined that graphene would some how eventually be produced from very thin exfoliation of large flake graphite. What do they have? I found their NR strange.

    March 24, 2015 - 5:27 PM

  • Peter Clausi

    Excellent question and that’s what we hope independent researchers can tell us. The press release says “naturally occurring flake graphene”, which if they’re using the word correctly means they have found one-atom thick layers of honeycombed carbon products. I hope they got it right, because if they didn’t they will need really good lawyers.

    March 24, 2015 - 5:48 PM

  • Alvarita

    This from an article on MIT Technology Review:

    “Graphene is a naturally occurring material. Layers of graphene make up the graphite found in pencil lead. When you trace a pencil on a piece of paper, these layers are cleaved, leaving thin layers of these carbon sheets. By crushing graphite and peeling it with tape into ever-thinner flakes and eventually into pieces just one atom thick, Geim and Novoselov were able to make usuable quantities of graphene that could be studied and to lay to rest doubts about graphene’s stability.”
    So technically they may be justified in making such a claim. It wouldn’t be the first time a claim was made that raised an eyebrow or two. The HREE sector is full of them, and I don’t see any lawyers rushing to court to question them.

    March 24, 2015 - 8:01 PM

  • hackenzac

    Graphene comes from graphite and by its very definition of being single layer cannot be mined directly ergo they do not have a graphene deposit. They have a graphite deposit that is perhaps amendable to making graphene from but that’s not what they said.

    March 24, 2015 - 8:49 PM

  • Tracy Weslosky

    Good morning Peter and Team.

    Love the article as I enjoy your writing Peter, thank you. I think more attention needs to be focused on Anaconda’ outstanding news release last week where Anaconda’s Point Rousse Project announced record sales volume of over 4,500 ounces of gold in Q3 FY2015 http://bit.ly/1HkSoMp — right on. We as shareholders love words like “record sales volume”….congrats Dustin and Team.

    As for the Alabama Graphite announcement, I will continue to stand behind their announcement and am diligently trying to secure an interview with one of the top scientists at the University of Alabama so we can ask these excellent questions you are supplying us with: great work InvestorIntel audience!

    Now, we had some words go back and forth which were DELETED and I ask that if anyone has any trouble with anyone, just email us at info@investorintel.com and we will handle.

    Again, Peter — love your writing. Cheers. Tracy

    March 25, 2015 - 9:23 AM

  • hackenzac

    Tracy; Why do you stand behind Alabama’s announcement? I know that you’re a promoter and I don’t have a problem with that or make comments impugning the motives of the analysts here due to unreasonably perceived conflicts of interest but still, I find your statement curious. What do you mean? Do you mean that you’re just going to take it at face value until further explanation?

    March 25, 2015 - 10:25 AM

  • Bigger is Better: Fission Uranium Sold and the Athabasca Basin is in Play | InvestorIntel

    […] play, and Fission Uranium Corp. will be bought out within six months. See earlier articles here and here and here. Our investment thesis was this part of the world has too many junior companies with […]

    July 7, 2015 - 1:04 PM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *