EDITOR: | June 13th, 2014 | 3 Comments

Iraq developments underline strategic value of Canadian oil sands

| June 13, 2014 | 3 Comments

maria-van-der-hoeveIf ever there was a doubt that the output of Canada’s oil sands needs to be increased, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) have removed that doubt. Once again, we have been reminded by the insurgent takeover of parts of western Iraq that Middle East oil is vital but potentially the subject of political instability and security challenges. And it will be again a decade hence when crude output in the United States begins to plateau by the mid-2020s. As the International Energy Agency (IEA) has stated, by that time it will be the Middle East again that will provide the necessary sources to meet oil demand. In a recent interview IEA executive director Maria van der Hoeven made the point that “the Middle East’s increased investments remain absolutely critical to the long term outlook for oil markets”.

In fact, according to a report this week in Canada’s Financial Post the IEA believes that country’s oil sands industry needs to invest $42 billion a year through 2035 to ensure the industry remains an engine of growth (and an alternative to the Middle East). It will be needed, not only for Canada and the U.S. but also energy-hungry Asia. Reports this week also quote a senior executive of India’s ONGC (Oil and Natural Gas Co) saying pipelines have to be built to transport the oil before it will invest in oil sands production.

In view of what has happened in Iraq in the past few days, we have had a sharp reminder of how important are longer-term investment in alternatives to Middle East oil.

“Iraq oil infrastructure at risk” is a report out today from Deutsche Bank. It says the outbreak of violence by ISIL Sunni rebels has introduced a new event risk for global oil markets. Iraq has the fifth largest oil reserves in the world and has now passed Iran to become the second largest producer in OPEC. The Sunni activity has so far been confined to the north of the country so it is not yet posing a risk to most of Iraq’s oil output. Deutsche says the more immediate problem is the threat to Iraq’s refining capacity: the insurgents are active in Mosul province and the country’s largest refinery, Baiji which processes 310,000 barrels a day, is located near Mosul. But this may not be the extent of the uprising. “The speed of the ISIL progress and its fortification with newly acquired weaponry suggests that this may be more than a temporary incursion,” says Deutsche.

If ISIL is able to make southward progress towards Baghdad this will heighten instability in the country and possibly threaten the smooth operation of existing refineries and oil fields. The bank says the greatest concern would be any detrimental impact on investment in new capacity. Now producing about 3.4 million barrels a day, the world is depending on Iraq expanding to 4 million barrels a day by the end of this year and then heading to 5 million barrels.

As Deutsche points out, this comes against a background where production in recovery in Libya has been much slower than expected.

But, even if ISIL does not manage to disrupt much of Iraq’s oil output, it still throws a large question mark over reliability of the Middle East. There always seems to be a new drama breaking out somewhere in that region.

Yet here we have the Canadian oil sands with their estimated 168 billion barrels of oil, a resource of black gold exceeded by only those of Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. In 2012, oil sands output reached 1.8 billion barrels a day, so the industry has become a meaningful player in the oil business.

Next week the federal government in Ottawa is expected to make a decision on Northern Gateway, the pipeline intended to deliver crude from the oil sands of Alberta to the British Columbia coast for export.

The events now under way in Iraq underline the future importance of this energy source.


InvestorIntel.com is a leading online source of investor information that provides public market coverage for both investors and industry alike. A qualified online influencer through ... <Read more about InvestorIntel>

Copyright © 2021 InvestorIntel Corp. All rights reserved. More & Disclaimer »



    Not gonna happen. If you are going to write about the Oil sands include All relevant facts. Alberta oilsands is landlocked and a pipeline to market Pacific ocean and Asia requires going though the Province of BC where 100% of the land is claimed by First Nations without Treaty. If you are going to write about Canada then you should at least understand the laws that govern Canada the Constitution that gives the First Nations the right to challenge the Federal government for any laws on land that has not been paid for. The Feds knows they will loose in court when they have not met the standards set by the Supreme Court of Canada to consult/veto on land that had not been settled under land claims. The government had 100 years to settle and they can wait another 1000 years.
    Under British law land that has not been paid for does not fall under the law of the Crown…no link to ownership therefore if the Federal government insist on pursuing this the question will come up whether the Province of British Columbia is part of Canada which was a possible outcome under Delgamukuu.

    June 13, 2014 - 9:19 PM

    • Robin Bromby

      The comments re Canada were quoting published sources WITHIN Canada. So perhaps the people at The Financial Post, the Alberta newspapers, the International Energy Agency, etc., don’t possess your special insights either.

      June 14, 2014 - 5:44 PM

  • Daniel

    The Financial Post, the Albertan newspapers are Eastern position and Alberta have a special interest. You are right they dont possess my insight especially if they do shoddy reporting. If you want to counter me hire a Constitutional expert and look up the threshold required by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Duty of the Federal Government to consult. You are looking at ten plus years in court to loose either way. Let see if Harper dares to invoke clause 10 and risk being the Prime Minister who bearks up Canada. I have 30 years on you on this one subject.

    June 14, 2014 - 9:23 PM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.