China’s REE Environmental Case.

China's REE Enviornmental Case"When I saw so many forests turn to dead bare hills because of rare earths exploiting. I only feel sad," Sun said, "The hills are not what you see. It’s deteriorating from within."

While a growing scandal engulfs the Communist Party in China, it hasn’t stopped a growing Chinese PR campaign designed I  think, to shore up China’s REE export regime defence at the World Trade Organisation. Below, the English language, heavily foreign read, China Daily gets with the program.  China Daily is China’s semi-official English language “window into China.” My guess is that it’s an attempt to try to get the international “greenies” to rally to their cause. China is being exploited selling REE “gold” for the price of “cabbage” to use their folksy comparison.

The environmental cost of rare earths
Updated: 2012-04-10 18:38
China has been paying a hard price exploiting its rare earths resources. It’s said that a year’s gold is sold at the price of cabbage.

Jiangxi province, rich in rare earths minerals in China, earned 32.9 billion yuan ($4.89 billion) from this industry last year, but it has to spend 38 billion yuan to tackle the environmental pollution in Ganzhou, one city in the province, according to an Economic Information report.

Subscribe here to receive free daily InvestorIntel updates

Huge price to pay

The way to get rare earth materials is devastating to nature and the damage is irreversible. It used to be described as the "remove mountain campaign" in Ganzhou, Economic Information reported.

A traditional process to get this mineral will eradicate trees and grass first and peel off topsoil of the earth. What's more, the waste water coming from the chemical reaction is full of ammonia nitrogen and heavy metals, which are extremely harmful to people's health and the nature.

While the argument may or may not rally the environmentalists to China’s cause, it carries little weight in a dispute over export taxes and quotas that discriminate in favour of China’s domestic firms. Remediating the environment is not best tackled by setting up a two tier pricing mechanism favouring manufacturers inside China against those outside.

As to selling gold for the price of cabbage. Welcome to the world of Richard Nixon’s fiat-currency dollar reserve standard. Every goods and natural resource of real present, or future intrinsic value, is today exchanged for essentially worthless paper currency.  Currency that can be electronically magicked into existence out of nothing. Since 1971 we have been living in a world of ever depreciating floating fiat currencies. We consume today, tomorrow’s resources with gay abandon. Tomorrow will never come we pretend, although it very nearly arrived in 2008, and still seems to be lurking just around the corner for the rest of this decade.

China might have a better defence under the doctrines of scarcity, in that they oversupply REEs in relation to their reserves, and necessity, they need them now and in the future for their own needs. They might want to badger the G-20 into monetary reform, but that will likely take an even bigger crisis than 2008. While the present system exists, the west needs to get on with developing more Molycorp’s and Lynas’s.

  1. Thank you Graeme Irvine for this article. Once again you are doing a marvelous job highlighting the real issues.
    The article for me is helpful as the ROW comes to grips with the REE new realities.
    My quick take:
    1. Do you feel knowing all the facts as another does and “walking a day in someone else’s moccasins” as the American Indian saying goes is a reasonable starting point?
    2. For a moment, lets assume Chinese leaders are good leaders, and are attempting to make wise decisions for the Chinese people? Isn’t that a worthy occupation of the leaders of all countries, even in democratically elected representative government?
    3. Why not “get inside the Chinese heads” and see the logic in their thoughts and actions?
    4. At least 2 or 3 years ago, Chinese leaders but political and scientific have encourage the ROW to develop their own resources.
    5. Why?
    6. Why not?
    7. As you state: why sell REEs at “cabbage prices” to anyone.
    8. Who having the ability to turn REE raw material “cabbages” into state of the art high tech products, would continue to see raw REEs to anyone else?
    9. Let’s say any merchandiser that can turn any $1 buck raw good into a $ 100 one hundred dollar finished product, would continue selling the raw good at $ 1 one buck?
    10. The Chinese have stated over and over their desire and their need to use more and more of their own REEs in developing their own REE high tech industry.
    11. Yes China is the biggest polluter on the planet and shall never agree to join the “Climate Change” debacle.
    12. However, the Chinese are producing the lion’s share of new “green technology”. Wind turbines, EV cars, low emission rapid transit systems, hybrid fuel efficient cars, etc.
    13. Their “greenie goals and 5 year targets” are astounding.
    14. China’s great leap forward in alternative energies is unparalleled in the world. Massive outlays of resources in Wind, Solar and Nuclear energy technology and practical deployment.
    15. Yes, and Top Down Bureaucratic controls upon the REE industry. 155 chosen survivors chosen by the central goverment, organized into the China Rare Earth Association. Long overdue development I might add.
    16. Why not accept and appreciate China as different?
    17. Don’t forget any governmental system in the real world has its positives and negatives. That includes China, or for that matter the “old world” of EU and USA?
    18. The ROW “winners” shall seize upon the opportunities afforded them by China’s need to utilize most or all of their raw REEs, and even import the HREEs by 2015.
    19. Why the “gnashing of teeth” by the old world stagnating economies? Why the “misdirection” strategies of WTO lawsuits?
    20. Why the “fabricated” stories about Pentagon and DOD actions if necessary?
    21. Personally, I see REEs from Chinese eyes.
    22. China is run in a rational responsible understandable and reasonable manner.
    22. Why don’t ROW political leaders see the folly of their own ways?
    Once again, thank you Graeme Irvine.
    Kind regards,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>